Wednesday, December 17, 2008

SEC: Oops, we *&^#ed up!

One of the frustrating thing about the last three months is, in reality, one of the frustrating things about the last 16 years (at minimum): The SEC's complicity in the downward spiral of the economy and systematic unraveling of the financial safeguards meant to protect everyone from the neophyte investor to, say, the Royal Bank of Scotland.

The commission said it received credible allegations about the scheme at least nine years ago and will immediately open an internal investigation to examine why it had failed to pursue them aggressively.

...

“Our initial findings have been deeply troubling,” Christopher Cox, the S.E.C. chairman, said in his statement. The commission received “credible and specific allegations regarding Mr. Madoff’s financial wrongdoing,” but did not respond aggressively, he said.

“I am gravely concerned by the apparent multiple failures over at least a decade to thoroughly investigate these allegations or at any point to seek formal authority topursue them,” Mr. Cox said.


Best case is the SEC were a bunch of Gomer Pyles too retarded to tie their own shoes. Worst case is we had pedophiles in charge of kindergarten. The truth is probably a combination of the two, with both administrations appointing economically like-minded deregulators who answered to theory instead of fact (ok, maybe that's the worst case).

Either way this is just another example of the need for a) full, unequivocal transparency, and b) total de-politicization of the SEC. They need to be cops, guys who exist to enforce the law, not a political agenda.

Tuesday, December 16, 2008

Yes, I've been away

Sorry, I've been suffering post-election political burnout and trying to work through a new feature script at the same time, so adhocdaily has been, ahem, less than "daily" for the past month. My apologies.

In the meantime, I'd like to encourage everyone to continue to enjoy the Bernie Madoff story. In case you missed it, here's the money shot:

"Many Wall Streeters suspected the wrong rigged game, though: they thought it was insider trading, not a Ponzi scheme," Blodget wrote. "And here's the best part: That's why they invested with him."
Love is not a strong enough word for my feelings about this story.