Tuesday, October 28, 2008

Why Bloomberg?

I've been pretty focused on the national crisis and election over the past few months, so I haven't really had time to devote the full weight of my incredulity at Mayor Bloomberg's coup d'etat. Let me rectify that.

I'll start with the obvious question: What the f*ck?

Second question: What the hell has Bloomberg done to make us think he's the right guy to handle this crisis and the profound effect it is already having on the NYC economy? The argument is that "this is the crisis he's been preparing his whole life for," but the reality is that this is the crisis he helped build.

Let's hop in the way-back machine and travel to 2003, to a point at which then first-term Mike was up against it for the high cost of living and taxes in the face of a decline in the number and spending power of the city's middle class. His answer to his many critics:

''If New York City is a business, it isn't Wal-Mart -- it isn't trying to be the lowest-priced product in the market,'' a draft of the speech reads. ''It's a high-end product, maybe even a luxury product. New York offers tremendous value, but only for those companies able to capitalize on it.''

Mr. Bloomberg's address signaled, in perhaps the starkest terms yet, his change from a man who thought higher taxes would ''destroy this city'' to one who sees the city he governs as a value-added commodity.

''New York City is never going to be the lowest-priced place to do business; it is just the most efficient place to do business,'' Mr. Bloomberg told reporters later. ''You have to get value for the moneys that you're going to spend.''

Essentially, "suck it up and move to the suburbs." And politically, at least, it worked. The financial sector boomed during the middle part of this decade based largely upon the mortgage industry (more on that in a minute) and produced salad days somewhat akin to the dot-com boom of the mid-90s. Meanwhile, manufacturing jobs in the city have droppped by nearly 30% since 1995.

No one noticed, though, because Bloomberg's gambit of creating higher paying jobs then taxing the bejesus out of them to create his "luxury product" seemed to have worked. You'll have to trust me on these numbers - I can't find the article they're from anywhere, but anyway - 10% of NYC's new jobs added during the Bloomberg administration have been in the financial sector. However, more than 30% of the new income came from those jobs.

Yes, that's insanely out of whack. Building the economy based on speculation and a construction boom begat by shady mortgages is not a long-term solution, nor is it good government. And now we pay the price.

How? Well, I can see from my rooftop half a dozen new condo complexes that have halted construction somewhere between 30% and 70% complete. These are structures that are lying fallow, so to speak - not producing jobs, homes, or tax revenue for the city. The companies that secured the building contracts all buggered off when the property owners, marginal investors all, ran out of money. The owners ran out of money because the banks ran out of money. The banks ran out of money because they were betting on the mortgages that the perspective homeowners who would have been buying a spot in Mayor Mike's highrise hell no longer can get.

I'd call it a vicious cycle if it wasn't so patently stupid. And just as stupid is that Bloomberg has been complicit in the whole deal with his rush to rezone everything into erstwhile Battery Park Cities, and an even bigger rush to tax the middle class into New Jersey.

Yet he says he's the man to lead us out of this crisis. This, the same man who said in May the best solution was to "pray that Wall Street does well."

Well, Mayor Mike, it hasn't, and you're clearly out of ideas. So I'll give you one: Let's pray that the city council (I'm looking at you, Christine Quinn) finds a set and overturns their own vote. No more rewarding the people who got us into this mess because it's politically expedient to do so, and no more short-sighted profiteers masquerading as populist heroes.

Mayor Mike, your experiment is over. Please, just let the clock run out.

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

Wow…a blogger hating on Mayor Mike…I never thought I’d see that. Here is a man who amassed his wealth by providing information in the MOST efficient way and minus ANY spin. Bloomberg made it possible for anyone w/ a computer, common sense, and AMBITION to compete with the Wall St. Boys Club. He gave us a great opportunity…Do you remember when America was about opportunity instead of handouts? Also, are you saying NYC should recruit its’ workforce from the same talent pool as Wal-Mart? I always thought that the decline in manufacturing was because of Wal-Mart. I buy cheap work boots at Wal-Mart that were made in China – A worker in the US who makes Redwing Boots is no longer needed – He loses his job and has to buy his overalls at Wal-Mart – and so on…

Locke said...

Mayor Mike's business achievements - you're right to praise Bloomberg News - don't make up for the fact that he's been a disastrous mayor. He needed to have seen the burst of the housing bubble coming, but he didn't.

And your Wal-Mart analogy doesn't hold water, because you present a false dichotomy. The choice isn't "All Wall Street" vs. "All Wal-Mart," as you couch it. The best choice is diversification. Even someone with a degree from a state school should know that!

Your rhetorical question about opportunity vs. hand-outs is wrong as well (and don't get me started about someone from the hedge fund industry bemoaning gov't hand-outs). What Bloomberg has done is limit opportunities for anyone but the financial elite. Luxury City, baby!